聚焦绿色数字新经济 两岸企业家共拓产业合作“新蓝海”******
(台海观澜)聚焦绿色数字新经济 两岸企业家共拓产业合作“新蓝海”
中新社厦门12月21日电 (记者 闫旭)“数字科技应用无所不在，成为推动经济发展的新引擎，台企在大陆内需市场大有可为。”参加2022两岸企业家峰会年会的台湾大学科技政策暨产业发展研究中心执行长詹文男如是说。
在20日于厦门举行的2022两岸企业家峰会年会上，开拓大陆内需市场、共拓数字经济“新蓝海”、探索两岸产业融合新模式等议题，成为两岸工商界人士关注的焦点。
詹文男认为，以数字经济为代表的新一轮科技革命和产业变革，带来了生产力的提升和产业的创新发展、转型契机；数字科技应用渗透到城市治理、公共交通、医疗、智能制造、家庭生活等方方面面，台企可积极布局云计算、物联网、元宇宙、集成电路、健康医疗等产业。
是次年会以“建构产业合作新模式，打造绿色数字新经济”为主题，推动两岸企业在制造业高端化智能化绿色化、数字经济、低碳产业等领域的合资合作。多位两岸企业家接受中新社记者采访时表示，两岸经济融合密不可分，广大台商应更积极主动融入大陆新发展格局，拥抱内需市场，分享发展红利。
厦门东亚机械工业股份有限公司作为一家扎根厦门30年的台资企业，一直探索数字化转型。“搞好数字化研发、生产和管理，这是一条光明大道。”该公司董事长韩莹焕称，通过数字技术对传统生产线进行智能升级后，生产效率显著提升，自动化和信息化水平大大提高。
两岸企业家峰会台湾方面理事长刘兆玄说，提升数字科技可有效促进产业绿色低碳转型，推动低碳化可大幅释放数字技术的发展潜能，加速产业的数字化应用创新和转型进程。两岸应携手合作，共同挖掘这两个极具长期发展潜力的新产业商机。
台湾中原大学国际贸易与经营学系荣誉教授、工商协进会顾问林圣忠表示，大陆新能源汽车、新能源电池走在世界前列，台湾半导体产业在全球占有重要地位。“两岸互补性强，可共同打造芯片产业链。”
林圣忠建议，两岸产业界更多聚焦绿色减碳、生物科技等行业领域，构建符合新时代要求的两岸产业合作新业态和新模式，增强两岸产业链供应链的韧性，着力提升两岸产业融合的层次。
“一带一路”绿色发展国际研究院执行院长张建宇亦建议，两岸企业家携手掘金绿色基建、绿色能源、绿色交通、绿色金融等重点领域，共同构建绿色低碳循环产业链，推动两岸绿色低碳产业又快又好发展。
不少与会台商认为，在2050年前将工业化以来的全球变暖幅度控制在1.5℃以内的净零转型，需要企业投入一定的成本，这既是挑战也充满机遇；未来，两岸企业可以携手合作向绿色低碳、数字赋能转型升级，寻觅新的商机。
在日前举行的中央经济工作会议上，大陆明确将大力发展数字经济、新能源、人工智能、生物制造等重点产业。两岸企业家峰会大陆方面秘书长林军表示，希望双方产业小组聚焦数字化转型、智能制造、节能减碳等领域的产业链合作，从单个企业、单个项目、一个地区或一个城市开始，逐步扩大合作领域，争取获得务实成果。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 快乐彩票地图 |
